Great news is building in Indiana!


From IndyStar.com

A new poll shows Treasurer Richard Mourdock building a commanding lead over Sen. Richard Lugar.

The Howey/DePauw Indiana Battleground Poll, conducted by two prominent Republican and Democratic pollsters, shows Mourdock with a 48 percent to 38 percent lead over Lugar.

[...]

The poll was conducted April 30 to May 1 of 700 likely voters by Republican Christine Matthews of Bellwether Research and Democrat Fred Yang of Garin-Hart-Yang Research Group. It has margin of error of plus or minus 3.7 percentage points.

[...]

Only about a month ago, a Howey/DePauw Battleground poll showed Lugar leading Mourdock 42 percent to 35 percent.

In a few days we could see the banishment of a Washington icon.  He’s certainly not an Indiana icon, he hasn’t lived there for for 36 years.  Hopefully Mr. Lugar this will be good riddance.

You can help retire Dick Lugar by donating to Richard Mourdock Right Here!

 


Rick Santorum. Glad you’re gone, don’t come back.


 

Rick Santorum.  Big government pro-lifer.  And maybe even not so much on the pro-life thingy.

We’ve been deluged by hundreds of pathetic posts defending Rick Santorum’s “conservatism.  Thankfully his campaign has been suspended and don’t have to read that stupid crap anymore.  There is talk of “Santorum ’16″ but after today that claptrap will hopefully die a metaphorically violent death.  From DC Caller today…

Just 12 days before a bitter primary pitting Washington power players against each other, former Sen. Rick Santorum endorsed Republican Nebraska Senate candidate Jon Bruning on Thursday.

Erick laid out Jon Bruning’s profile just yesterday, here are the highlights
and last but certainly not least, Bruning Supported Abortion: “I think a woman should have a right to choose. I’m not saying I personally believe in abortion, but I think a woman has a right to decide what to do with her own body. Personally, I think life begins in the tenth week of gestation upon the inception of brain waves in the fetus. Regardless, I don’t want the government making this decision for women.”
Next time somebody talks about Santorum being a “conservative” remember this list.  He supports Jon Bruning, a lifetime Washington power addict who is one more poster child for everything that is wrong about Washington and everything that is wrong in the Republican Party.
What are you going to do next Ricky?  Endorse Orrin Hatch and Dick Lugar?
I’ve never been a fan of Mitt Romney but this makes me ever so glad that Mr. Whiny Big Government is gone, now if Mitt will only see fit to deny him so much as one minute of speaking time at the convention.  Santorum is every bit the fraud that Ron Paul is.  From the Daily Caller…

“Nebraska State Treasurer Don Stenberg is a lifelong fiscal conservative who will be a strong ally of pro-growth senators like Jim DeMint of South Carolina or Mike Lee in Utah,” the Club for Growth said in a statement announcing its support. “First, Treasurer Stenberg must navigate a tough Republican primary against some candidates with suspect fiscal credentials.”

Santorum called Bruning “the strongest conservative candidate to defeat Bob Kerrey in November and help Republicans take back the Senate.”

Go home to DC suburbs Sweater Boy.  Don’t come back.

 


A Mighty Warrior Has Gone Home.


From his website...


LANSDOWNE, Va., April 21, 2012— Evangelical Christianity lost one of its most eloquent and influential voices today with the death of Charles W. “Chuck” Colson. The Prison Fellowship and Colson Center for Christian Worldview founder died at 3:12 p.m. on Saturday from complications resulting from a brain hemorrhage. Colson was 80.
A Watergate figure who emerged from the country’s worst political scandal, a vocal Christian leader and a champion for prison ministry, Colson spent the last years of his life in the dual role of leading Prison Fellowship, the world’s largest outreach to prisoners, ex-prisoners and their families, and the Colson Center, a teaching and training center focused on Christian worldview thought and application.

I’ve been privileged to serve as a volunteer with the organization that God led Chuck Colson to fond shortly after he got out of prison for his Watergate Related crimes.  I’ve been involved in many organizations and businesses in my life, never one that had the singular focus or high standards that I found in Prison Fellowship Ministries.  I never met Mr. Colson, but I saw the vision that God had given him reflected in the leadership and in the volunteers and in the work that God did through all of those involved with the ministry.  Only eternity will recognize the lives impacted and changed because of the humility and faithfulness of Chuck Colson.

The following video, posted on the Prison Fellowship website, tells his story better than I ever could.

I know that tonight every person who’s ever volunteered with Prison Fellowship, every inmate, ex-inmate or their famililies whose lives have been touched and forever changed because Chuck Colson heeded God’s call for his life is feeling the same loss my wife and I feel now. Chuck Colson was just family and while we celebrate his home going, we are overwhelmed with a sense of loss.

Well done good and faithful servant. I certainly can’t say it better than that.


The final embarrassment. April 24.


Rick Santorum looks like he’s toast. A month ago he was even in Wisconsin and up by double digits in Pennsylvania.

Last night he got blown out in Wisconsin based on the Republicans who voted – he did manage to get close when you include the crossover Democrats who voted for him. A week ago he was down to two ahead in Pennsylvania.  And that’s the good news for the Sweater Boy.

According to Public Policy Polling (PPP) things aren’t just “worse”, they’re looking like a disaster.

Mitt Romney’s taken the lead in PPP’s newest poll of Rick Santorum’s home state of Pennsylvania. Romney has 42% to 37% for Santorum with Ron Paul at 9% and Newt Gingrich at 6%. The numbers represent a dramatic turnaround from when PPP polled the state a month ago. Romney’s gained 17 points, going from 25% to 42%. Meanwhile Santorum’s dropped 6 points from 43% to 37%, for an overall swing of 23 points in the last four weeks.

Twenty three points in four weeks.  And Romney hasn’t even turned the advertising guns on Santorum yet.  It’s likely to get worse for Mr. Santorum unless he can mobilize the Democrats in Pennsylvania as he was able to in Wisconsin.  And, for the record, I have no idea if Democrats can cross over in Pennsylvania, the idea is just a lifeline for Santorum.  ***UPDATE:  a friend just emailed me and PA is a closed primary.  Really not good for Rick.***

I’m not in the least surprised by this.  Santorum is a well known entity in Pennsylvania and he’s not particularly well liked.  In 2006 when he got blown out after pandering to union voters by stopping national Right-to-Work legislation, the real killer was moving from Pennsylvania to the Washington suburbs and then taking money from his old Pennsylvania school district because his kids were being home-schooled.  That didn’t go down well and if you look around at comments in places other than Redstate you’ll find that the folks in Pennsylvania haven’t forgotten that little episode.

If you look at the internals, and they are available from a link at the summary linked to above, you’ll see what’s summarized below.

Romney’s made huge in roads with the groups that have tended to fuel Santorum’s success. What was a 37 point lead for Santorum with Evangelicals is now only 10 points at 44-34. What was a 32 point advantage for him with Tea Party voters is now only 6 at 41-35. And in the greatest sign that conservatives are starting to really around Romney a little bit, what was a 51 point deficit for him with ‘very conservative’ voters is now only 11 points at 44-33.

The sun is setting on Mr. Santorum.  If he lets his ego run things and gets blown out his political career is most likely over.  He’s been dogged throughout this campaign by his thrashing in the 2006 Senatorial race.  He’ll never live another beating down and rise to run again.  He likely won’t rise above dropping out now with the polls heading south, but a clean loss on his home turf would be a stake through the heart.

The primary is days from being, thankfully, over.  Time to turn the guns – and that would be a metaphor thank you – on Barack Obama and his wrecking crew.

Oh, and don’t bother whining about PPP being a Democratic Pollster.  As it happens, they are consistently very accurate and it’s the trend line that matters not their perceived leaning.

UPDATE:  Rasmussen has Santorum up 4.  I haven’t had time to look at anything but the email heading and won’t for several hours.  Frankly, it doesn’t change much.  Yes, there’s an outside possibility Rick can pull out a narrow win.  That’s no consolation for the reasons noted.  And also Yes!, the numbers are still headed in Romney’s way big time.


Good for Sarah Palin! *** UPDATE: Comments from McCain! ***


THIS has the potential for absolute greatness.

Remember Katie Couric? Yeah, the one who got fired because she couldn’t turn around CBS News. You’ll remember that she was the “star” of the “Today” show, well, according to the Washington Post..

Katie Couric, the former sweetheart of NBC News’s “Today” show, is going to co-anchor ABC News’s “Good Morning America” next week, which will most likely nuke “Today’s” more than 16-year run as the most-watched morning infotainment-show.

Well, obviously the folks at GMA aren’t taking this one lying down. In comes Sarah. Could this be a death match? Personally, I hope so, because I’d love to feast on the footage of The Twit, Ms. Couric, being carried out in a metaphorical body bag because I think Sarah may very well stomp Twitsie’s hoped for ratings into the ground. I hope.

It’s no secret I’m not on Sarah Palin’s political bandwagon, but I’ve long maintained she’s one heck of an entertainer and a good draw. I really hope she makes this a full time gig and does so well that people forget who Katie is. Or was. Or whatever. Go Sarah! Turn Katie in just another also-ran.

Heh.
____________________________________________________________________________
UPDATED WITH COMMENTS FROM JOHN MCCAIN


Santorum is wrong on his “manufacturing zero tax”.


I’ll cut to the chase, Rick Santuorm is not only a big-government pro-lifer, he’s part of the reason we’re overrun with government.

Santorum is trying to sell the idea that he’s some sort of “conservative” and lots of fools are buying it.  He does have a strong record on issues  that are near and dear to the hearts of the so-called Social Conservatives, but if you look at what the people who front that movement espouse, they are anything but “conservative”.  They basically want the government to provide the community support that the church used to when they still had a clue what their mission was.  The Catholic Church and the Evangelical Movement, for the most part, supports the social welfare side of government expansion.  There is nothing conservative about that.

With respect to Santorum’s zero tax for manufacturing as a way to revitalize the nations employment base, he’s simply wrong.  He has no clue what motivates the private sector because he hasn’t been in it forever.  All he’s doing is tinkering with the tax code in a slightly different way than Obama does.  And, it won’t make a difference.  Federal taxes, by and large, don’t impact manufacturing in a way that will accomplish an expansion of the manufacturing base and create jobs.  While the tax code is an enormous problem, zeroing out taxes for one segment – and wait until the lawyers work on defining “manufacturing” – will do nothing but make lawyers rich and give the Congress the opportunity to decide whose taxes go up to “pay for” the “manufacturing tax cuts”.  Nightmare on Pennsylvania Ave.

The problem is not taxes, it’s over-regulation.  In other words, too much government.  Santorum is talking about adding more government to “fix” what he thinks is the problem and is ignoring the real issue, regulation.

Breitbart has a piece on California’s problem with revenues, the legislature keeps raising tax rates and putting measures on the ballot for additional “temporary” tax increases and revenues keep going down.  Doh.  The article also notes that businesses are fleeing California in increasing numbers and outlines the reasons they’re leaving.  Let me note upfront that state taxes have a significantly greater impact on business operations than a federal tax because a business can do something about a state tax.  They can move.  Here’s the money quote from Breitbart and I’ve reformatted their paragraph to bullet points for ease of reading.

Spectrum Locations Consultants recorded 254 California companies moved some or all of their work and jobs out of state in 2011, 26% more than in 2010 and five times as many as in 2009. According SLC President, Joe Vranich: the “top ten reasons companies are leaving California:

  1. Poor rankings in surveys
  2. More adversarial toward business
  3. Uncontrollable public spending
  4. Unfriendly business climate
  5. Provable savings elsewhere
  6. Most expensive business locations
  7. Unfriendly legal environment for business
  8. Worst regulatory burden
  9. Severe tax treatment
  10. Unprecedented energy costs.

Vranich considers California the worst state in the nation to locate a business and Los Angeles is considered the worst city to start a business. Leaving Los Angeles for another surrounding county can save businesses 20% of costs. Leaving the state for Texas can save up to 40% of costs. This probably explains why California lost 120,000 jobs last year and Texas gained 130,000 jobs.

Nine out of ten reasons businesses relocate are directly related to state regulation and the business environment that the state maintains, one out of ten is taxes and it’s number nine on the list.  In addition, if you look at the savings that is available by relocating, the 20% to 40% are well outside the tax range of the state of California.  The article doesn’t break down the savings, but you can bet that things like workers comp insurance is probably higher on the list than taxes.

Bottom line, Mr. Santorum your policy centerpiece is total BS.  The tax code should be scrapped and rewritten, but your policy idea won’t accomplish a thing, except to give lawyers a nice payday when they’re making the case that everything under the sun is “manufacturing” and Congress will have a field day deciding who gets to “pay” for your lousy policy.

This crap is what happens when we let people who’ve never had a real job – much like the current resident of the White House – run for President.

Go get a real job and contribute to the economy Mr. Santorum.


A question for Social Conservatives…


We’re seeing a number of commenters and a diarist or two insisting they won’t violate their principles and cast a vote for serial womanizer Newt Gingrich.

 

I wasn’t real happy with the idea of Newt being President when he announced, for a whole variety of reasons, though his personal relationship issues were pretty far down on the list.  But we’re where we are today, and the reality of the situation is that we don’t have a solid conservative left in the pack.  At some point last year, I was really hopeful that Mitch Daniels would run.  He’s got the best record of any sitting governor (Perry included, IMO) in terms of conservative accomplishment.  He was panned as a “trucer” on these pages and declared, on the basis of this “affront” to SoCons, to be personna non grata in the contest.  He chose to not to run for reasons more likely related to his wife, and he’s out.  I defaulted to Perry and would have been tickled to see him inaugurated.  He’s gone.

So, we’re down to Newt, Romney and Santorum.  I don’t count Paul because he’s not a Republican and is in the contest only because the Republican Leadership in the House didn’t have the balls to toss him out of the Caucus years ago.  So, what do we do?  It looks right now that it’s coming down to Newt and Romney, Santorum will finish a distant third or perhaps fourth in South Carolina and I doubt he’ll have momentum, money or ground troops to contest Florida.  Personally, I say good riddance, we don’t need another big-government former Senator.  Newt seems to have the big Mo right now, and while that certainly could change, he’s got a decent shot at what was unthinkable, he could be our nominee.  There will not be a brokered convention.

So, my question for SoCon’s is simple.  What are you going to do if Newt is the nominee??  And to add some flavor to the broth, note this from Associated Press today:

 WASHINGTON (AP) — Many church-affiliated institutions will have to cover free birth control for employees, the Obama administration announced Friday in an election-year move that outraged religious groups, fueling a national debate about the reach of government.

In a concession, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said nonprofit institutions such as church-affiliated hospitals, colleges and social service agencies will have one additional year to comply with the requirement, issued in regulations under President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul.

Got that?  Free birth control.  Take my word for it, abortion coverage is only eleven months away.

Now then, if Newt is the nominee, are his personal relationship problems more important than what we all know the Obama Administration will do for their friends at Planned Parenthood.  What will you do?  Vote in protest for Obama?  Stand on your principles and stay home or vote for a third party or write in?  Or vote for Newt?


The beginning of the end…


or at least the end of the beginning, of abortion on demand. And, it’s been initiated in two VERY blue states.

Some personal background. I’m ardently pro-life and have been involved in the movement for well over 30 years. I also am a firm believer that there is next to nothing that a President can do to stop abortion, beyond a minimal impact with Executive Orders reinstating Mexico City, etc. A Constitutional Amendment would be DoA. Not only is 2/3 of the Congress not doable, 2/3 of the States is impossible. Add to that, there are seven versions of the Human Life Amendment (HLA) that have been introduced in Congress and five of them do not “stop” abortion, they simply get the feds out of the debate. I could expand on this, but I hope you get the idea. The Federal government won’t (and realistically can’t) outlaw abortion, the best they’re going to do is return the issue to the states IF we have a more conservative SCOTUS (+2 Justices) who overturn Roe.

So, why would I say that abortion is – or at least may be – on the way to being a bad memory? From the Associated Press today…

WASHINGTON (AP) — Authorities say two out-of-state doctors who traveled to Maryland to perform late-term abortions have been arrested and charged with multiple counts of murder, an unusual use of a law that allows for murder charges in the death of a viable fetus.
[...]
The investigation began in August 2010 after what authorities say was a botched procedure at Brigham’s clinic in Elkton, located near the border of Maryland and Delaware. An 18-year-old woman who was 21 weeks pregnant had her uterus ruptured and her bowel injured, and rather than call 911, Brigham and Riley drove her to a nearby hospital, where both were uncooperative and Brigham refused to give his name, according to documents filed in a previous investigation by medical regulators.

A search of the clinic after the botched abortion revealed a freezer containing 35 late-term fetuses, including one believed to have been aborted at 36 weeks, the documents show.

Brigham, 55, is charged with five counts of first-degree murder, five counts of second-degree murder and one count of conspiracy. Riley, 46, faces one count each of first- and second-degree murder and one conspiracy count.

Read the whole article, there’s a whole lot more there that will turn your stomach, but it’s an important read.

The bottom line here is that two very blue states – Connecticut and New Jersey – are cooperating in investigating and charging two doctors with first degree murder in the deaths of second and third trimester babies. They took the case to a Grand Jury and got an indictment. They will most likely go to trial, and you can bet they’ll be using photographs that no newspaper will run to make their case to the jury.

It’s going to be an uphill battle for sure, nothing worthwhile comes easily, but a win here gives us the opportunity to get courts to affirm that unborn children – at least those beyond the first trimester – are, in fact, “people” with a right to due process.

This is important because it gives the pro-life movement a real “camels-nose-under-the-tent” to begin to roll back the availability of abortion by law.

This action by Connecticut could be a landmark case that does what no President, no Congressional action and no Supreme Court decision involving current law can do.

2012 is going to be a landmark year in more ways than just TheOne. And, given that a conviction of the doctors involved here will most certainly be appealed, and likely all the way to SCOTUS, should give us all the reason we need to support a Presidential candidate who will nominate solidly conservative SCOTUS Justices.


Lamar Smith is a pathetic weasel.


You can find all the details about Smiths in-kind work for the MPAA with SOPA in Neils diary, but I just found an update courtesy of Instapundit and TechDirt:

Despite the fact that Congress was supposed to be out of session until the end of January, the Judiciary Committee has just announced plans to come back to continue the markup this coming Wednesday. This is rather unusual and totally unnecessary. But it shows just how desperate Hollywood is to pass this bill as quickly as possible, before the momentum of opposition builds up even further.

Bottom line, Smith is a sleaze, call your Rep and demand a stop to this farce. Oh, and hey Texas, got anybody to primary this schmuck?


Hmmm. Interesting results over there…


At HotAir

A little background first. I think it’s common knowledge that I don’t like “candidate specific” polling this far out and I absolutely hate internet polls. So, I will be making no claims about the efficacy of this one. But it’s interesting nonetheless.

HotAir tends to be home for lots of fans of Sarah Palin. I’m not accusing HotAir of being biased or being in the Palin Camp, only that lots of her fans (not necessarily Shriners, just fans) seem to hang out there. And it’s reflected in their monthly GOP Presidential polling results. Palin has come in first in their poll every month for a very long time, I think it’s safe to say every poll, but I’m not sure about that. I am sure that she’s been way ahead of the crowd in every poll I’ve seen at HotAir. Until today.

Palin’s numbers dropped for the second consecutive month, but the news is that Perry’s numbers have not only overtaken Palin but are higher than she’s ever been at 48% of respondents favoring the three term Governor from Texas. Palin is still holding onto second place in the HotAir poll by a wide margin at 32%.

Equally interesting is the second round where the pollsters ask for your choice if your first choice isn’t running. Perry comes in first there too and Palin drops to number four.

I’ll be interested to see the commentary after the next couple of debates, we’ll likely find out if Perry is a flash in the pan or if he really has “the mo”.


So here’s a new standard for stupidity…


From WBALTV.com, we bring you [drum roll please]…

This would be Otis Rolley

Otis Rolley is a candidate for Mayor of Baltimore. You guess which party. Otis Rolley is dumber than a box of small rock. That’s rock singular. Small rock singular. Multiple rocks would overwhelm his intellect. If elected, he could give Shiela Jackson Lee a run for the dumbest elected official in the US.

So Becker, why are you making such a racist statement? Well, thank you for asking.

A mayoral candidate’s plan to reduce violence in Baltimore includes a “bullet tax” that he said will increase the cost of committing a crime.

Otis Rolley said he would, if elected, propose a $1 per bullet tax on all bullet purchases in the city. The idea was part of an overall crime plan he unveiled Tuesday.

Got that?

This jackass has an “overall crime plan”. I’ll admit I haven’t read it. Don’t think I have to, given that this piece of stupidity is included in it.

Rolley said the bullet tax would cause a decrease in “random firings that too often happen around holidays” and put a high price tag on the cost of committing a crime.

“While the courts have consistently ruled against significant gun control legislation, there is still a way to decrease crime: substantially increase the cost of its commission,” Rolley’s plan states.

Hmmm. Let’s say I was a resident of Baltimore. Let’s say I own a gun. Let’s say I’m low on ammo. How might I possibly avoid a $1,000 surcharge for 1,000 rounds of 223 ammo that I can purchase from a retailer in Phoenix for $250? Hmmm. Gosh. Hmmm. Oh yeah…

  • Wilmington, DE – 71 miles – 1 hour 25 minutes.
  • New Freedom, PA – 38 miles – 50 minutes.

And that’s just for starters.

Hopeful office holders, and current office holders, in addition to “office”, hold the record for abject stupidity.

Now then, for the real point of this diary, pay attention to that $1 tax. SCOTUS repeatedly beats down these fools who have a hearty dislike for the Second Amendment and they’re looking for a way around it. Well, here it is. And it will turn your incredibly effective $2,900 integrally suppressed AK47 into a not very effective stick.

Here’s your choice:

 

 

OR

 

Pick one.


Time to elect a RINO.


But he’s not running, a victim of his ability to put both feet in his mouth on the national stage and the self-righteous stupidity of one segment of the Party. I recall the frequent epithets hurled at Mitch Daniels when he was considering getting into the fray, and often as not “RINO” was the least of the accusations.

From the Washington Times yesterday…

As Washington stares at rising national debt and projected deficits for years to come, many states are faced with the opposite problem: whether to spend their budget surpluses and, if so, on what.

At least a dozen states ended fiscal 2011 with surpluses. Indiana reported one of the largest, with an extra $1.2 billion in its accounts. Gov. Mitch Daniels, a Republican, on Friday authorized bonus payments of up to $1,000 for state employees. An employee who “meets expectations” will get $500, those who “exceed expectations” will receive $750 and “outstanding workers” will see an extra $1,000 in their August paychecks.

“No state anywhere comes close to Indiana’s record of spending tax dollars carefully, with total savings over the last six years in the billions. Your spending efficiency has enabled us to stay in the black even as revenues plummeted,” said Mr. Daniels, who recently flirted with a run for the White House but ultimately stayed out of the race.

I’m the first to point the finger at Daniels ability to make ill-conceived statements. But there is no better record of accomplishment out there than his. On fiscal matters AND on social concerns like abortion. It’s unfortunate that we don’t have room for highly credible and extraordinarily competent and conservative Governors like Daniels.
We seem to be looking for someone with marginal accomplishments who can whip up the base.


Great News for Texas. Ron Paul Edition…


The jackass is done with politics next year.

AUSTIN, Texas — U.S. Rep. Ron Paul said Tuesday he will concentrate on running for president and will not seek re-election to Congress, ending a 24-year career as one of the more colorful members of the House of Representatives.

The 75-year-old Republican said he will serve out his term through December 2012, whether his presidential campaign is successful or not. He told The Associated Press he has been criticized for running for Congress while seeking the presidency in the past.

He won’t be the Republican nominee. He won’t be running a third party campaign, at least one that matters. He’ll be gone from the Republican Caucus in the House, finally – and they should have tossed his worthless butt out of the Caucus long ago because he’s not a Republican.

The best part? Texans will get the opportunity to actually elect a congressman who might actually be an effective member of Congress and represent the interests of the district with something other than earmarks.

Farewell sir. It’s well past time for you to go. Like 22 years past time. You won’t be missed.


Conan O’Brien absolutely nails it!


HT to the really smart guys at Powerline.

Conan O’Brien was the commencement speaker at Dartmouth this year.

Dartmouth also saw fit to honor George HW Bush with an honorary degree.

Let me note that I have generally no use whatsoever for commencement speeches. They are typically long, nobody remembers a word of them and they do absolutely nothing but enhance the checking account of the ego driven speaker who loves to hear him/herself talk. That said, Mr. O’Brien is at the top of a very, very short list of really important and memorable things said to a graduating class:

Before I begin, I must point out that behind me sits a highly admired President of the United States and decorated war hero while I, a cable television talk show host, have been chosen to stand here and impart wisdom. I pray I never witness a more damning example of what is wrong with America today.

Thank you for your honesty Mr. O’Brien. You’ve jumped way up in my estimation of you (not that it matters), and that deserves to be the quote of the century to this point.


Christine Gregoire gets it half right!


Congratulations Governor Gregoire, you’re finally on the right track.

Washington Gov. Chris Gregoire, a Democrat, said today she won’t seek re-election to a third term and will devote her remaining time in office to finding a solution to the state’s economic woes.

Ms. Gregoire, if you really give a hoot about creating jobs in Washington you should simply resign now. And actually, you, in conjunction with the Obama Administration and the Unions in Washington State have done a pretty good job of creating jobs. In South Carolina.

Hopefully Republicans can find somebody who’s willing to go to war come the next election.


Romney: First it was RomneyCare, now we’ve got WarmingMitts.


Reuters has the story today.

(Reuters) – Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney broke with Republican orthodoxy on Friday by saying he believes that humans are responsible, at least to some extent, for climate change.

“I believe the world is getting warmer, and I believe that humans have contributed to that,” he told a crowd of about 200 at a town hall meeting in Manchester, New Hampshire.

“It’s important for us to reduce our emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases that may be significant contributors.”

This is just another pebble on the pile for Mitt as far as I’m concerned. The guy was very good in private industry. He was a big government, give the Democrats what they want but do it cheaper, when he was Governor of Massachusetts and he’s yet to find a problem that government can’t solve.

I’ll vote for Ron Paul or Sarah Palin before I vote in the primary for Mitt Romney.


Well, this is certainly going to be interesting…


HT to Hotair…

We need more nerdy wonks. We’ve grown fat and stupid on a red meat diet.

I don’t know if TPaw should be our candidate, but I think this is a good start. He got bad reviews at CPAC for a red meat speech that he didn’t carry off particularly well. Hopefully he’ll fight the urge to repeat that fiasco. In this two minutes of pre-announcement, he seems to be setting the stage for a serious run. And he notes several important things. First, he served two terms as Governor of a Democratic state. Second, he governed as a solid conservative and moved the state to the right. Proof of that is that after two terms of conservative, and sometimes pretty hostile, governance the people of Minnesota turned both houses of their legislature over to Republicans and many of those are pretty conservative. Third, he understands the issues – the deficit, the overreach of government and jobs.

I think this is a good start. By the end of today, it could be an excellent start.

Category:

The debt ceiling really doesn’t matter.


We’ve had a whole lot of talk about raising the debt ceiling in the last few months and the conversation, frankly, is mostly just hot air. The US is most likely headed for a financial wall at high speed without regard to action on the debt ceiling and that howling that if we don’t raise the ceiling we’ll damage the “full faith and credit” of the US government is laughable. It’s happening right now and is about to accelerate like the space shuttle leaving it’s launch pad.

Here’s a simple explanation of why we’re about to go into the “face meets wall mode”.

First let’s look at how we finance the US government. The financing mechanism for Uncle Sam is made up of a number of cash in-flows:

  • Federal income taxes.
  • Tariffs and fees.
  • Borrowing through the use of US Treasury bond auctions.

Tariffs and fees account for a miniscule portion of the revenue, taxes are the major revenue producer and the debt auctions have to make up the difference between “income” (taxes, tariffs & fees) and “expenditures”, the total of on and off-budget spending by the Administration and Congress. With me so far?

I’m going to assume that our readers understand the tax revenue stream so I’m not commenting on that here. If you have questions, post them in the comments and they can be answered individually. Tariffs and fees fall into the same category and are a generally small portion of overall revenue.

Which brings us to the Treasury auctions. The US auctions off Treasury bonds on a regular basis. Very generally, the auctions work like this:

  • The Treasury schedules an auction and announces it will be selling $X billions of dollars of bonds at Y% yield.
  • Buyers purchase said bond offerings.
  • Buyers include: other countries (China, etc), private bond investment houses.

Here’s where it starts to get hinky. Let’s say the Treasury is offering $100B in bonds at a 3% yield. The auction produces $65B in purchases at that offering. The Treasury now has two options, they can take the $65B and not sell the other $35B or they can raise the yield above 3%. The conundrum is this. If they don’t sell the $35B they have, in effect, lowered the debt ceiling and will not be able to meet the cash expectations of the appropriators effectively cutting the budget by that $35B. They also send a loud message to bond holders/traders that demand is down, and think about the basic law of supply and demand here. When demand is down for automobiles, the cost of the car will go down to bleed off supply overages. When demand is down for financial instruments, the yield of those instruments must go up in order to increase demand.

Bottom line, can’t sell the bonds this time, the next time that 3% will 4% or higher. That raises the interest cost line in the federal budget and makes it necessary to either get more money (borrow more) or reduce spending in other places by a comparable amount. See the spiral effect?

Lately, the Treasury is having problems finding buyers for their bonds so the federal reserve has undertaken a program of buying up the left overs in order to keep the yield low. Let’s see now, where does the federal reserve get money since they can’t tax or charge tarriffs or fees. Oh yeah, they print it. The net effect is that there have been significant shortfalls in bond sales to third party buyers and the US government is buying up the debt, in effect lending money to themselves. Think Ponzi.

OK, so you’ve got the basics now and you see that the federal government is buying it’s own debt to finance operations. Here’s the problem. Come June the federal reserve is planning on stopping the printing press. They’ve said that they’re going to get out of the bond buying business. Well hey, there’s always the Chinese and the private bond traders, right? Jim Lacey at National Review lays out the ugly scenario in detail, please read the whole article, he’s much better at this than I am.

Researchers at [a major bond investment house] estimate that in the last quarter, the Fed purchased 70 percent of all new Treasury debt. This is a disaster in the making. By printing new money to buy debt, the Fed is both holding interest rates artificially low and flooding the world with dollars. Fed purchases have lowered rates to the point where there was no room for further decreases. With no more upside potential to holding debt, investors are fleeing on the assumption that the Fed will soon exit the market, causing rates to rise dramatically. Such a rate rise lowers the value of all current U.S. debt…

Lacey notes that pretty much all of the major investment houses have stopped or dramatically curtailed US Treasury purchases and many are dumping their current inventory of Ts on the expectation that new auction yields will jump dramatically. Other major holders are also dumping inventory, namely the Chinese.

So what’s on the horizon? If you’ve got a weak stomach, stop here.

Come June, the Fed will be in a bind of its own making. If it stops pumping money into the system, interest rates will increase, and not just on Treasury bonds. Mortgage rates will rise and business credit will become more costly. The recovery could be strangled in its infancy. If it keeps on buying bonds, however, it risks never being able to wean the markets off the equivalent of monetary crack. Worse, the flood of dollars will continue to drive down the value of the dollar, raise commodity prices, and propel global inflation.

There pretty much is NO upside here. Rates go up and or inflation takes off. Mr. Obama you need to bring Jimmy Carter back from North Korea and add him to your stable of economic advisors who’ve never held real jobs.

Enjoy May. We’re in for a really long hot summer. And when you can’t borrow money or the cost of the borrowing is so excessive that the cost no longer justifies the purchase you’re left with about one alternative. Downsize. This is why the arguments about the debt ceiling are hot air. And why Paul Ryan’s budget proposal may begin to look like nothing more than trimming around the edges. The reality is – and we’ll likely know over the next three or four months – the government may well shut down and not because the Congress didn’t pass a budget or raise the debt ceiling, rather because nobody will lend us money any more.

Sure is going to be an interesting primary election season.


Yes! Winter’s over and the Silly Season is upon us!!


Looks like the Republican Primary maybes are getting warmed up to the task. And a caveat, I don’t consider the following to be “silly” in any depreciating manner, I just enjoy the sight of politicians either defending the indefensible or admitting they screwed up.

Let’s start with Defending the Indefensible. Mitt is the current undisputed champion in this category. I’m sure we’ll have people giving him a run for his money before long, but he IS the standard here. From Reason

Mitt Romney is still defending the health care overhaul he signed into law as governor of Massachusetts. So are liberal defenders of ObamaCare, an overhaul explicitly modeled after the Bay State’s law.

And from his own lips

“Overall, ours is a model that works,” Romney said in response to a question after a speech at Iowa State University. “We solved our problem at the state level. Like it or not, it was a state solution.”

This pretty much leaves me speechless. You really should read the whole Reason link, it will give you a good idea just how out of touch with reality Mitt Romney is.

Moving right along to the Oops! category

We’ve got two early entrants. The first would be Mitch Daniels who, after being invited to a tar and feather party where he brought his own feather pillow named “truce”, it looks like he got the message. As has been documented all over Redstate for the last couple of days, Mitch announced he’s signing the bill that will restrict some abortions and defund Planned Parenthood. He didn’t come right out and say “I was an idiot to talk about a truce.” but this is pretty close.

And then there’s Tim Pawlenty up in New Hampshire. I give him three gold stars for this

Asked in a public question-and-answer session about his past support for a cap-and-trade-like program limiting carbon emissions, Pawlenty answered: “It was a mistake, it was stupid and I’m sorry.”

And then he kept going.

“I don’t try to defend it. Everybody’s got a couple of clunkers in their record,” Pawlenty continued, repeating: “I don’t try to defend it. It was dumb.”

Good job TPaw.

Oh, and Romney followed TPaw, was asked about RomneyCare and defended it again.

I can’t wait for things to really heat up.


Apparently still the Stupid Party…


It’s been an interesting year so far. We’ve got Republican Governors standing up to public employee unions and winning not just the legislative battles but the PR battles as well. Wisconsin, Indiana, New Jersey in the bag with more fights looking like wins in other states. We’ve actually got Governors who’ve figured out that unions are not their friends and will never be.

And then there’s Florida.

Some background. State Senator John Thrasher introduce a bill in the Florida Senate that had two fundamental provisions. First of all it would require public employee unions to get permission from their members annually to spend union dues on political activity. Second, the state would stop collecting dues. The State Senate in Florida has 40 members, 28 of whom are Republican.

Even though the Florida House has already passed a similar bill, the bill has been withdrawn.

It seems Republican members of the Florida Senate have bought into the lie that unions are bipartisan and friends of Republicans in Florida.

Union lobbyists repeatedly said the bill would cripple the payroll deductions that fuel labor’s political efforts while continuing to allow similar deductions at 360 organizations and private companies, including insurers, that spend money on politics.

Unions also said they were being scapegoated for Florida’s budget problems. They argued that the recession and Wall Street, not union-negotiated pay and benefits, caused Florida’s $3.6 billion deficit.

Those arguments resonated with lawmakers.
[...]
In a sign that the bill is in trouble, Governor Rick Scott, a Republican, personally lobbied four Republican senators on Wednesday to back it…

So, it appears that Florida’s new Republican Governor is on board, the Florida House is solid but the Senate is beyond wishy-washy. Apparently 12 of 28 Republican Senators oppose this bill, and of course the Democrats are solidly sold out to the unions.

Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. It’s a Republican legacy.